Dragon Ball Editor Torishima Believes Daima Is a 'Trash' Anime

Followers of Dragon Ball aren’t any strangers to heated debates over the franchise’s many spin-offs, sequels, and remakes. Nevertheless, the most recent controversy didn’t come from followers, it got here from somebody who helped form the sequence itself. Former Dragon Ball editor Kazuhiko Torishima, identified for working straight with creator Akira Toriyama, made sharp remarks about Dragon Ball Daima throughout a current livestream.

Table of Contents

Torishima, who as soon as guided Toriyama throughout the manga’s golden years, has at all times been outspoken in regards to the state of the franchise. However this time, his feedback hit more durable than common. On his YouTube stream he didn’t mince phrases, based on the interpretation by way of @sandman_AP on X, calling Daima “a trash anime” and suggesting {that a} Vegeta-centered storyline would have been a greater artistic selection.

Torishima’s Harsh Criticism of Dragon Ball Daima

Dragon Ball Daima - Goku looking shocked surprised anime featured image

Torishima’s remarks shortly unfold throughout the anime group, sparking outrage, assist, and loads of debate. His blunt claim that Daima was “trash” shocked many longtime fans, particularly contemplating his pivotal function within the franchise’s early success. As Toriyama’s former editor, his voice carries uncommon weight, giving his criticisms extra credibility than the common web sizzling take.

His suggestion that Toei Animation ought to have targeted on Vegeta as an alternative of launching Daima hit a nerve. Many followers have lengthy felt that Vegeta, regardless of being a fan-favorite, has been underutilized in newer Dragon Ball tasks. For Torishima to echo this sentiment reinforces the concept the franchise could have missed a significant alternative.

Nonetheless, critics of Torishima argue that dismissing Daima so fully is unfair. The sequence has barely had an opportunity to outline itself, and labeling it “trash” earlier than it matures ignores the opportunity of progress and innovation. Some see his remark as extra reflective of his private preferences than an goal analysis.

The Fan and Trade Response to this Daima Assertion

Vegeta looking shocked against a dark background in Dragon Ball Daima. — Vegeta trying shocked towards a darkish background in Dragon Ball Daima.

Unsurprisingly, the fandom cut up into factions nearly immediately. Some agree wholeheartedly with Torishima, arguing that Dragon Ball has been creatively stagnant for years and that Daima does little to reignite the sequence’ originality. They argue that Torishima’s harsh honesty could push Toei towards bolder storytelling sooner or later.

Others, nevertheless, felt his feedback crossed the road. Dismissing a complete manufacturing undermines the work of numerous animators, writers, and voice actors who’ve poured their effort into making Daima a actuality. To them, labeling the sequence “trash” so bluntly was needlessly disrespectful and dismissive of its potential viewers.

Throughout the trade, Torishima’s phrases spotlight a bigger pressure between preserving Dragon Ball’s legacy and finding fresh ways to expand it. Whereas his perspective displays the voice of an period when Dragon Ball was breaking boundaries, fashionable creators could really feel the necessity to experiment, even when it dangers alienating traditionalists.